BBC Bias Digest

  • BBC judges itself over climate change bias. Guess the verdict! 3rd September 2024
  • Ofcom ‘harmed the public’ in its Covid/Steyn ruling against Mark Steyn 21st August 2024
  • Ten years on, BBC bias is worse than ever 18th March 2024
  • Lying about Farage? At the BBC, it’s par for the course 25th July 2023
  • The BBC witch-finders are coming for YOU 4th July 2023
  • Don’t worry, Huw, your £410,000 BBC salary is safe 18th April 2023
  • BBC shrugs off report from the echo chamber 2nd February 2023
  • The BBC at 100: Leading the push for totalitarianism 20th October 2022
  • The BBC’s 100 years of glory – by its hired historian 30th August 2022
  • The BBC, skewered through its rotten core 16th August 2022
News-Watch
03:04 am
16 May 2025
  • Home
  • Bias Archive 2014-21
  • BBC Bias Digest
  • About News-Watch
  • Research and Reports
  • Documents Archive
  • Contact Us

European Election Survey – June 2004

News-Watch Reports | 9th June 2004 | 0 | by Andrew

This report assesses whether coverage of UKIP by the BBC Radio 4 programme Today – the corporation’s flagship news programme – in the build-up and immediate aftermath of the elections to the European parliament on June 10, 2004, was fair, impartial and accurate.

The election was a remarkable result for UKIP. Although opinions vary about whether or not support will be replicated in other elections, the party attracted a 16.1% share of the poll, registering a 252% increase in votes over 1999 and coming both ahead of the Liberal Democrats in the constituencies they both contested, and within 6% of the overall
share of the governing Labour party.

Labour was reduced to its lowest share of a national poll for 80 years, and the Conservatives to their lowest proportion since 1832.

No matching file Show all files
     | Size:
Next »
Page of
« Prev

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

About the Author

Andrew

View all posts by Andrew →
Previous
Paper for the Centre for Policy Studies – ‘Blair’s EU Turn’
Next
Survey of the Today Programme, Winter 2004

Related Posts

  • News-watch Survey of BBC ECU Rulings

  • News-watch Supplementary Submission to DCMS Mid-term Review, September 2022

  • News-watch Submission to DCMS Mid-term Review, July 2022

  • News-watch Survey – The Nationality and Borders Bill

Most Read

  • BBC reporting of pandemic ‘is alarmist and biased’

    BBC reporting of pandemic ‘is alarmist and biased’

    12th October 2020 | 7
  • MARDELL: ANTI-BREXIT BIAS CONTINUES

    MARDELL: ANTI-BREXIT BIAS CONTINUES

    4th May 2016 | 5
  • The gloves are off in BBC’s fight against Brexit

    The gloves are off in BBC’s fight against Brexit

    28th June 2016 | 4
  • Appeal: Help us stop BBC bias!

    Appeal: Help us stop BBC bias!

    4th July 2019 | 4
  • BBC Concedes Political Bias – But Only Against Corbynistas

    BBC Concedes Political Bias – But Only Against Corbynistas

    22nd September 2016 | 3

Popular Posts and Pages

  • BBC judges itself over climate change bias. Guess the verdict!
  • Ofcom ‘harmed the public’ in its Covid/Steyn ruling against Mark Steyn
  • Ten years on, BBC bias is worse than ever
  • Lying about Farage? At the BBC, it’s par for the course
  • The BBC witch-finders are coming for YOU
  • News-watch Survey of BBC ECU Rulings
  • Don’t worry, Huw, your £410,000 BBC salary is safe
  • BBC shrugs off report from the echo chamber
  • News-watch Supplementary Submission to DCMS Mid-term Review, September 2022
  • News-watch Submission to DCMS Mid-term Review, July 2022
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.